Okay so what class should i be looking into?
Moderators: Rich Rock, Mazdahead, Matt Rowe
-
- Novice
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 2:35 pm
- Current Racecar: 1982 Mazda Rx7 GS
- Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Okay so what class should i be looking into?
I spent awhile this morning pouring over the PDFs on the SCCA website. But im still not 100% sure what class i should be running in. Im thinking in the production category, either level 1 or 2, but im not sure.
Generally speaking prepared seemed to be 1990 and newer model years, which i have a 1985, so that is out.
Improved Touring states no turbo/supercharged vechiles. So again, that is out.
And that basically only let me with Production. Is my assumption correct? I want to start building my car, but i would like to avoid doing silly things that create problems for myself.
Generally speaking prepared seemed to be 1990 and newer model years, which i have a 1985, so that is out.
Improved Touring states no turbo/supercharged vechiles. So again, that is out.
And that basically only let me with Production. Is my assumption correct? I want to start building my car, but i would like to avoid doing silly things that create problems for myself.
"Some people are afraid of heights, not me. I'm afraid of widths"
Visit my EBay Store --- http://stores.ebay.com/Ohio-Speed-Works
1987 Mazda Rx7 Turbo II
1985 Mazda Rx7 GSL-SE
1982 Mazda Rx7 GS
Turbo Dodge Parts garden
Visit my EBay Store --- http://stores.ebay.com/Ohio-Speed-Works
1987 Mazda Rx7 Turbo II
1985 Mazda Rx7 GSL-SE
1982 Mazda Rx7 GS
Turbo Dodge Parts garden
-
- Novice
- Posts: 1363
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:35 pm
- PHA Permanent Number: 7
- Current Racecar: ITC Rabbit, G/Prod Rabbit, H/Prod Scirocco, GTL Rabbit, TR4, Formula SAE
- Location: Reading, PA/ Hammonton, NJ
GLH turbos are in DSP according to 2007 Rules. As long as your modifications are in the Street Prepaired guidlines and rules don't change for 2008.
Keep in mind there has been a suggestion presented to PHA to outlaw all turbos in Street Mod classes. Can't say it will happen but perhaps you can be involved in the meetings to give input. That might not be practical from your location but input can be given on your behalf. If you would like to have a conversation with the proposer, Mike Ancas, I'd recommend you contact him direct. He is Speednation located in Pittsburgh.
That might be a moot point if you modify your car beyond Street Prepared guidlines. Street Mod is you next choice. Pretty much lets you do anything as long as it is street legal and the driveline parts remain the same manufacturer.
Good Luck
Dave Y.
Keep in mind there has been a suggestion presented to PHA to outlaw all turbos in Street Mod classes. Can't say it will happen but perhaps you can be involved in the meetings to give input. That might not be practical from your location but input can be given on your behalf. If you would like to have a conversation with the proposer, Mike Ancas, I'd recommend you contact him direct. He is Speednation located in Pittsburgh.
That might be a moot point if you modify your car beyond Street Prepared guidlines. Street Mod is you next choice. Pretty much lets you do anything as long as it is street legal and the driveline parts remain the same manufacturer.
Good Luck
Dave Y.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:24 pm
- PHA Permanent Number: 37
- Current Racecar: '85 Dodge Charger 2+2
- Location: Fleetwood
okay so what class should I...
There has been such a proposal put forth and some discussion but just that... There is no reason for you not to campaign a turbo car at this time or in the future. No turbos would put a fair number of competitors out of action.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 2:35 pm
- Current Racecar: 1982 Mazda Rx7 GS
- Location: Cleveland, Ohio
it looks like im in SM1 just due to my motor selection. I really dont care to run the motor as a complete unit. Plus, its a 2.5 so it already put me out of the class. But OTHERWISE, the car is basically a street prepared. Its just the motor (the fun stuff) puts me right into street modified. Which i dont mind seeing i also intended on using a steering quickener, which might i add is vaguely described on how to be installed by 16.1.f.1 like its states....grrrr
"Some people are afraid of heights, not me. I'm afraid of widths"
Visit my EBay Store --- http://stores.ebay.com/Ohio-Speed-Works
1987 Mazda Rx7 Turbo II
1985 Mazda Rx7 GSL-SE
1982 Mazda Rx7 GS
Turbo Dodge Parts garden
Visit my EBay Store --- http://stores.ebay.com/Ohio-Speed-Works
1987 Mazda Rx7 Turbo II
1985 Mazda Rx7 GSL-SE
1982 Mazda Rx7 GS
Turbo Dodge Parts garden
Actually, it doesn't say that. The FSP entry says:FV195 wrote:Grace, FSP, no turbos, I'm thinking SM or SM2
Chrysler / Dodge / Plymouth
Acclaim 4-cyl non-turbo
Arrow 1600 & 2000 & 2600
Champ non-turbo (all)
Colt FWD non-turbo
Colt non-turbo (8V)
Colt RWD 1600 & 2000
Daytona non-turbo
Horizon & TC3 & Turismo, 1.7L
& 1.8L & 2.2L
Laser all non-turbo (‘89-’99)
Omni & 024 & Charger
Rampage 2.2L
Sapporo 1600 & 2000 & 2600
Shelby 2.2L non-turbo (’83-
’84)
Spirit 4-cyl non-turbo
Nothing about Omni non-turbo. Just Omni. I'm reading that as legal for FSP as long as it meets the rest of the Street Prepared rules.
What am I missing?
Grace
-
- Novice
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:24 pm
- PHA Permanent Number: 37
- Current Racecar: '85 Dodge Charger 2+2
- Location: Fleetwood
okay so what class should I be looking into
Grace, the cars in FSP are the normally aspirated omnis, horizons, etc.; the turbo'd omnis-like the GLH- are in DSP...
-
- Novice
- Posts: 1363
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:35 pm
- PHA Permanent Number: 7
- Current Racecar: ITC Rabbit, G/Prod Rabbit, H/Prod Scirocco, GTL Rabbit, TR4, Formula SAE
- Location: Reading, PA/ Hammonton, NJ
Let me clarrify. Mike Ancas proposed a rule to delete (maybe a better term) the turbos from D Street Prepared. The logic is that is SOLO I turbos are not that much of an advantage. Also SCCA has kind of given up on trying to enforce non modification of turbo controls in SP. Uncontrolled turbos in a hillclimb is an unfair advantage.
I agree with Mike for that and other reasons. Should I say it and have the ugly head reappear(yes ). Turbo cars are too fast for roll bars only!
I have an alternate proposal for the next meeting. No turbos (in SP)unless the entrant can prove absolutly no modifications to turbo or any controls, certify boost limit or some such wording.
Mind you this is talk, not rules yet. Your input would be appreciated.
As far as you Street Mod guys....the sky is the limit. Be smart, put a cage in it
I agree with Mike for that and other reasons. Should I say it and have the ugly head reappear(yes ). Turbo cars are too fast for roll bars only!
I have an alternate proposal for the next meeting. No turbos (in SP)unless the entrant can prove absolutly no modifications to turbo or any controls, certify boost limit or some such wording.
Mind you this is talk, not rules yet. Your input would be appreciated.
As far as you Street Mod guys....the sky is the limit. Be smart, put a cage in it
- Steve Tumolo
- Novice
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 8:50 am
- PHA Permanent Number: 30
- Current Racecar: 2000 Mustang
- Location: Shillington, PA
It almost sounds like Mike has a DSP car hidden somewhere that he could get a record in as long as there are no turbos out there to take it away from him . Just Kidding!
All kidding aside I thought 4 cylinder turbo cars ran in BSP for hillclimbs? Or is it another forgotten rule that has not appeared in the sups for a few years so it is just forgotten about.
Matt Green ran his Charger in BSP for a few years.
All kidding aside I thought 4 cylinder turbo cars ran in BSP for hillclimbs? Or is it another forgotten rule that has not appeared in the sups for a few years so it is just forgotten about.
Matt Green ran his Charger in BSP for a few years.
#30 A-Sedan Mustang
-
- Novice
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:24 pm
- PHA Permanent Number: 37
- Current Racecar: '85 Dodge Charger 2+2
- Location: Fleetwood
okay so what class should I be looking into
There was a change-by PHA-back in the early to mid-90s which moved the turbo cars (my recollection of it invoved a Dodge Colt Turbo) to BSP...what happened to that change is lost in time (I think we went back to the SOLO I car classification).
-
- Novice
- Posts: 1363
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:35 pm
- PHA Permanent Number: 7
- Current Racecar: ITC Rabbit, G/Prod Rabbit, H/Prod Scirocco, GTL Rabbit, TR4, Formula SAE
- Location: Reading, PA/ Hammonton, NJ
So, the precedent has been set by PHA in the past? Might be a solution to consider to resolve this debate. It might not have to involve bumping to BSP. CSP might be enough. We would have to look at manufacturing spec of rated HP to weight on a case by case basis.
All you SM turbo guys can relax. This is Street Prepared. Bumping turbo cars would require they comply with all SP rules for thier respective class including turbo boost limiting controls.
Thought we'd have heard from Matt G by now.
All you SM turbo guys can relax. This is Street Prepared. Bumping turbo cars would require they comply with all SP rules for thier respective class including turbo boost limiting controls.
Thought we'd have heard from Matt G by now.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 8:23 am
- PHA Permanent Number: 79
- Location: NJ
- Contact:
I agree Dave, case by case and car by car is the way to do it... But my statement about the bump not being logical is mostly due to the raging debate amongst the cone-wackers involving BSP. The C4 vettes cant keep up with the STi's in BSP and this is making people very upset... If the vette guys are having issues I feel bad for the rest of BSP fields out there trying to keep with the AWD turbo cars that are compliant, let alone the people stretching the rules in those types of cars.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 1363
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:35 pm
- PHA Permanent Number: 7
- Current Racecar: ITC Rabbit, G/Prod Rabbit, H/Prod Scirocco, GTL Rabbit, TR4, Formula SAE
- Location: Reading, PA/ Hammonton, NJ
Here is an example: take Weatherly
Subaru WRX ran Rally, could also be BSP, has record at 60.8
BSP record 58.8
CSP record 60.8
DSP record 63.1
Turbo Mazda 323 in DSP form ran in 2006 60.1
The driver of the 323 was questioned on class legal and moved to SM but may have been able to make a case to stay in DSP. My favorite future project is an Audi A4 1.8 Turbo Quattro. That would be in DSP unless something would change. Don't think I'd have a problem bettering 63.1 in that car.
I may have put my foot in my mouth about case by case. That might be a big task.
More input needed
Dave Y
Subaru WRX ran Rally, could also be BSP, has record at 60.8
BSP record 58.8
CSP record 60.8
DSP record 63.1
Turbo Mazda 323 in DSP form ran in 2006 60.1
The driver of the 323 was questioned on class legal and moved to SM but may have been able to make a case to stay in DSP. My favorite future project is an Audi A4 1.8 Turbo Quattro. That would be in DSP unless something would change. Don't think I'd have a problem bettering 63.1 in that car.
I may have put my foot in my mouth about case by case. That might be a big task.
More input needed
Dave Y
- Steve Tumolo
- Novice
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 8:50 am
- PHA Permanent Number: 30
- Current Racecar: 2000 Mustang
- Location: Shillington, PA
After checking back at this thread it did occur to me that in the time frame I was talking about there was no such thing as a WRX STi or Lancer EVO. Those 2 cars changed the game. All we had were Shelby Chargers, GLH's and the Colt Turbo.
Like it was already said, A case by case might need to be looked into. It could turn into a slippery slope if were are not careful though.
Oh,, and Dave is right,, WHERE THE HECK IS MATT GREEN ON THIS ONE???
Like it was already said, A case by case might need to be looked into. It could turn into a slippery slope if were are not careful though.
Oh,, and Dave is right,, WHERE THE HECK IS MATT GREEN ON THIS ONE???
#30 A-Sedan Mustang